The nuclear family is a term used to define a family group consisting of aheterosexual pair of adults; wife and husband, and their children. It can also be known as a ‘beanpole family’ and it can be, especially in middle-class families, child-centered; child-centered is defined as being actively involved by spending lots of time together as the child's needs and wishes are the A nuclear family is defined as one male and one female with their biological children household (Greene, , “Nuclear Family,” para. 1). This traditional definition does not include homes of unmarried, heterosexual couples with children, nor does it · Critical debate on nuclear family. Many early functionalist sociologists’ perspectives on the family (Murdock, ; Talcott Parsons, ) focus heavily on the idea of the nuclear family, which consists of a married couple (male and female) and their biological offspring. There are many issues with the functionalist nuclear family model
Negative Effect Of Nuclear Family Free Essay Example
The nuclear family essay on nuclear family a term used to define a family group consisting of aheterosexual pair of adults; wife and husband, and their children. In there were Of these, essay on nuclear family, However, there are other types of families: extended family, essay on nuclear family, unconventional families; single parent families, essay on nuclear family, homosexual families and reconstituted families; step families.
However, it could be that a martial partner or partner has died or left unexpectedly, and after this a new intimate relationship is formed and the couple is likely to procreate. Other characteristics of a nuclear family are: parents having high-paid or good occupations, living away from other family members; independent or privatised; they keep in essay on nuclear family with family via phone and mainly see family on special occasions, e.
Christmas, Easter, marriages, funerals, and christenings. There are five theories by sociologist that either support or resent nuclear families. The theories that resent nuclear families are: Marxist and feminist; the nuclear family is not a perfect family. The theories that support nuclear families are: functionalist, essay on nuclear family, post-modern and new right; the nuclear family is the best type of family.
In contradiction to this, about two in five of all victims of domestic violence are men; and this is on the increase. However, men do not report domestic abuse from their partners because they are ashamed or embarrassed.
Also in favor of men, it is apparent that all men are different, the research and statistics are a generalisation; perhaps not completely reliable. In addition to this, recently there has been an increase in female dominated families;matriarchy, essay on nuclear family. It is not patriarchy male domination or men that are responsible for the position of women in families. She argues that women choose to give more commitment to family and children, and consequently they have less commitment to work than men have.
Ann Oakleyargues that gender role socialisation is responsible for sexual division of labor. She also argues that there is still an expectation for women to take on the housewife and mother role.
Because of this, it is more difficult for women to pursue careers as men do. Oakley also claims that employers expect women to play the role of housewife rather than pursue a career. This patriarchal ideology is justified by men through claims that women are more suited to caring roles because of their maternal instinct.
However, Sue Sharpe said that not all women take on caring roles because of their socialisation. They may react against their socialisation, or pursue a career. Charlie Lewis s stated that fathers are playing a bigger role; they a more committed.
Adrianna Burgess agrees with Charlie Lewis. A sociologist who wanted major changes was Charlotte Gilman. Gilman called herself a humanist and believed the domestic environment oppressed women through the patriarchal male dominated beliefs upheld by society. She argued that male aggressiveness and maternal roles for women were artificial and no longer necessary for survival in post-prehistoric times.
The brain is not an organ of sex. Might as well speak of a female liver. A Marxist view on the nuclear family looks at inequality. Similar to feminism, a Marxist approach to the nuclear family is cynical. A psychiatrist, David Cooper was critical of the nuclear family, and parents; they brought up children incorrectly, leading corruption!
He also thinks that this obsession is due to the past where parents were allowed to physically punish their children; violence and hitting, essay on nuclear family. More specifically, he states that schizophrenia occurs due to the family.
However, it may be un-noticed as mental illness is usually hidden. He believes that the nuclear family is isolated due to distant relationships with peers, and other family, which is caused by the location in which you live and the occupation you possess.
The nuclear family should be outward looking, and it is not, it is inward essay on nuclear family. In contradiction essay on nuclear family the beliefs of the above Marxist sociologists: the family, or within primary socialisation play an imperative in teaching their children discipline and self-discipline, which is vital for future employment.
It is therefore inevitable! With regards to the believes of Rd Laing, it has been known essay on nuclear family when diagnosing mental disorders or illnesses, other factors are present. Divorce is also more likely to occur in the nuclear family, in comparison to the extended family. The functionalist view on the nuclear family is optimistic. They believe that the nuclear family is the norm in modern industrial societies, and it has major functions essay on nuclear family contribute to the well-being of society: the family is the primary agent of socialisation; teaching norms and values; the family is central in creating consensus and order.
Talcott Parsons believes that the nuclear family provides key functions for society by learning morals, norms and values; primary socialisation, and it provides stability for children, essay on nuclear family. It is described to be universal and functional, essay on nuclear family. Parsons also argued that the family functions to relief the stress of modern day life.
Children or adolescences in nuclear families are unlikely to engage in crime, recreational drugs, anti-social behavior, and violence. It is only a small minority who engage in this acts; majority have been successful indoctrinated to be a good citizen. Also, Children or adolescences do better in education, exam results, universities, health and career, in a nuclear family. Children in nuclear families are likely to achieve academically, better health and careerwhereas children in single-parent families have lower academic performance, are more susceptible to peer pressure to engage in deviant behavior, have higher dropout rates from high school, and have greater social and psychological problems.
Similarly, Sam Redding indicates that in relation to academic outcomes, the potential limitations associated with poor economic circumstances can be overcome by parents who provide stimulating, supportive, and language-rich experiences for their children.
He essay on nuclear family that people expect more out of marriage and family life than they used to. Therefore divorce is becoming more popular; re-marriage is more successful and procreation is likely. He contends that the neo-conventional family that is characterized by joint conjugal roles and greater sexual equality has replaced it, essay on nuclear family.
New right or traditionalists believe that the nuclear family is the best type of family to live in and that everyone should live in this type of family, on the assumption that, it is on a permanent basis. A relevant example of the New Right approach to the family can be seen in the view that there exists and under-class of criminals, unmarried mothers and idle young men who are responsible for rising crime. It is argued that this under-class is welfare-dependent, and that adolescence girls are deliberately getting pregnant in order to obtain council housing or state benefits.
To hinder things further, this under-class is socializing its children into a culture revolving around crime, anti-authority, anti-world and anti-family values. The New right thinkers believe that there has been a significant amount of damage inflicted upon the nuclear family by, for instance, government policies.
For example, they claim that government have encouraged mothers to get back to work, but this has resulted in maternal deprivation; lack of love resulting in psychological damage.
There have been few taxes or benefits to encourage mothers to stay at home. The New Right argues that commitment to marriage has been weakened by divorce being made easier and single-parent families have been encouraged by welfare policies. It is apparently, more likely for those who are married and have children to stay together, which enables stability for children; children should only be brought up in the marriage by its heterosexual essay on nuclear family, both should be equal, essay on nuclear family.
The New right completely looks down upon divorce as in a unconventional family, children do not do as well, in terms of health, education, career etc. Specifically, the introduction of the contraceptive pill and the legislation of abortion in the s have been associated with the family decline.
Also, essay on nuclear family, essay on nuclear family Divorce Reform Act was seen as undermining commitment to marriage. Charles Murray While looking to the needs of sole parent families, governments have overlooked or ignored the needs of intact families.
Morgan states that the arrival of feminist advisers into governments has radically changed the way government benefits are distributed. The burden of taxation has increasingly been shifted onto married parents to the benefit of the single and the childless. As a result, lone parents can end up with higher final incomes from any given wage than two-parent families. Also, more mothers are tempted into the workplace, and more children are pushed into day care, in order for traditional families to stay afloat economically, essay on nuclear family.
A post-modernist view on the family is more neutral; all families can face difficulties; any family can be unsuccessful or successful. Post modernists suggest that in the post modern era there is a wide variety of family arrangements people can choose from — nuclear, extended, reconstituted, cohabitation etc. They claim that not one type dominates and that family arrangements are diverse and fluid. Post modernists see such flexibility as a positive thing. Judith Stacey for instance, suggests that a single individual will experience a variety of family structures throughout their life span.
Post-modernists argue that the post-modern family life is characterised by diversity, variation and instability. For example, women no longer aspire to romantic love, marriage and children. Cohabitation, single-sex relationships, economic dependence, pre-marital sex and childlessness are now accepted alternative lifestyles.
Others disagree with this view; they believe that the basic features of essay on nuclear family family have remained identical to the s.
Also, the increase in single-parent families and reconstituted families indicate that there is a slow drift away from the nuclear family, essay on nuclear family. Pakulskic and Waters believe that class can be seen as just one, essay on nuclear family, not very important, division in society along with ethnicity, gender, age, disability, etc. The development of welfare states and the institutionalization of class conflict have reduced the direct impact of class relationships.
Property has increasingly moved from private hands to being owned by organisations and the division of labour has become more complex. Moreover, increasing affluence for the majority has meant that most people are able to choose what they consume and therefore they are able to create their identities.
Judith Stacey argues that the greater choice for women gives them the ability to break out of there patriarchal oppression and shape their families to their needs. Therefore, women are the main agents of essay on nuclear family change, essay on nuclear family, by changing their role. For example, many reject the traditional house-wife mother role for a career or higher qualifications. Jeffery Weeks; growing acceptance of diversity. Weeks identified that there are shifts in attitudes since the s.
The shifts in attitudes are: sexual morality is mostly a matter of personal choice, Church and state have lost the potency to influence morality and there are favourable attitudes to homosexuality and cohabitation.
However, despite these changes in attitudes Weeks states that family patterns are not changing; most people want marriage, children are mostly still brought up by couples and many people who divorce get re-married. To contradict this, the New Right and functionalists would disagree and say that the patriarchal nuclear family is the best family as it meets the needs of society, essay on nuclear family. To conclude, I believe that the nuclear family can have a negative impact on its members, which feminist would agree.
However, all types of families, e. reconstituted family can have a negative impact on its members also. But, the nuclear family is seen to be the traditional family which people have been living in for centuries, so it can therefore be suggested that the changes in society have negatively affected the nuclear family, e.
10 Lines on Nuclear Family - Essay on Nuclear Family - Advantages and Disadvantages Nuclear Family
, time: 0:58Nuclear Family Essay - Words | Help Me
Anthropologist George P. Murdock () elaborated on the idea that the nuclear family is both universal and essential: “Whether as the role prevailing form on the family blogger.com as the basic unit from more complex families form, (the nuclear family) exists as a distinct and strongly functional group in every known society” (p) The nuclear family is a term used to define a family group consisting of aheterosexual pair of adults; wife and husband, and their children. It can also be known as a ‘beanpole family’ and it can be, especially in middle-class families, child-centered; child-centered is defined as being actively involved by spending lots of time together as the child's needs and wishes are the · Critical debate on nuclear family. Many early functionalist sociologists’ perspectives on the family (Murdock, ; Talcott Parsons, ) focus heavily on the idea of the nuclear family, which consists of a married couple (male and female) and their biological offspring. There are many issues with the functionalist nuclear family model
No comments:
Post a Comment